As arguable as it might seem, a scientifically validated finding holds that the maximum brain capacity known to humans is 10%. How they arrived at this is another matter, but the undeniable beauty of science is that it’s provably reliable and logical.
That said, the brain, particularly the neo-cortex is man’s real distinctive feature from other animals i.e. “Homo sapiens”, which is the scientific term for man, infers to the fact that we are “the thinking animals”. And by definition, the brain is the organ that controls the body. Thus, even while oblivious of such facts, we often simply say “it’s all in your head,” and also commonly realize that “all humans are fallible.”
Nevertheless, we all acknowledge that mankind has come a long way and, with the outstanding efforts of certain individuals that endeavor to use their remarkable (genius) brains, over time life is relatively simplified for successive human generations.
Interestingly however, whereas the possession of an exceptional thinking brain supposedly implies rationality in our ways, it is almost a fallacy in most cases. Because, if you paid attention to many normal people’s utterances and actions, as I do, you could greatly doubt whether we really use our brains at all.
As Albert Einstein once pondered: “The question that sometimes makes me hazy is, am I or the others crazy?”
I, too, was about to concede that, “we are all mad, only our levels of madness vary,” until a likeminded friend who is a Molecular Biologist intimated a scientific rationale that changed my mind.
He said, “Some people are in a vegetative state. Their bodies function well; their brains appear to be okay but are dull or inactive. So they actually seem normal, but are mentally abnormal Homo sapiens.”
Then it all now made sense to me. I mean; if you mix the ‘vegetates’ with the wilfully ignorant and misinformed, the desperately vulnerable, the manipulative, the indoctrinated, brainwashed or somewhat hypnotized and put them together with those that are overwhelmed by fear and desire of the imaginary hell-fire and the fantasy of paradise in the hereafter, respectively; you get the perfect picture of the real world we live in that is full of all sorts of superstitious beliefs that are based on general assumptions.
Therefore, it is no wonder that so-called believers, no matter how enlightened some might seem, their intellect is limited, biased and blinded by a deeply entrenched influence, until they independently subject their beliefs to critical thought.
Only then, with a truly liberated mind, can someone say and do something sincerely, not out of fear or expectation of reward.
Now, although I totally agree and support Article 37 of Uganda’s Constitution which clearly states that: “Every person has a right as applicable, to belong to, enjoy, practice, profess, maintain and promote any culture, cultural institution, language, tradition, creed or religion in community with others.”
I am of the cautious view that we all ought to thoroughly question and check the validity of our religious, cultural and sociological orthodoxies; otherwise they pose a massive danger to society, let alone inhibiting us from unravelling and demystifying the mysteries that clog our brains’ potential.
Because, in keeping with the tradition of beliefs or the way of the world, we tend to dogmatically and stereotypically uphold notions that restrict our curious minds to discussing only certain aspects of life while regarding others as sacred, unthinkable or taboo, and hypocritically pretending that all is well.
In other words, the inane inability to think outside the box (convention) is perhaps our continuous human undoing.
In that, people foolishly say and do things in resonance with and by influence of so-and-sos, without even asking or seeking other suitable ways of attaining their intended goals. That, in my view is a deadly coupling of blind faith and obedience, which is reinforced by ignorance and bigoted failure to question our dogmas, typically manifested in self-righteousness and impulsive actions that breed insurmountable sentiments and prejudice.
Indeed, on keen observation of the global human society, you will realize that religious and cultural or traditional beliefs and practices are ironically part and parcel of the evils and immoralities that bog down humanity. Unreasonable things like; terrorism, genocide, ritual murders, child sacrifice, genital mutilation, gender inequality, slavery, corporal punishment, polygamy, child abuse, discrimination, violence (religious and civil wars), and all sorts of inhuman deeds are absurdly rationalized in the name of protecting, maintaining and promoting the various religions, cultures and traditions that timelessly and greatly affect people’s lives and prosperity.
Because, as Robert Oxtom Bolton once observed: “A belief is not merely an idea the mind possesses, it is an idea that possesses the mind.”
But, as if that is not enough to endure, time and again, people are gullibly (mis)led into believing in supernatural powers through hearsay accounts of witchcraft, selective ‘miracle healings’, curses, demons, spirits, ghosts, etc.
And all just because the teachings of the various religions, cultures and traditions, that many people conform to and cherish, also acknowledge the existence of such things (through stories in the scriptures or passed on from one generation to another), the believers of the purported word-of-God automatically shut out logic without any-further-question or sufficient proof but faithful conviction!
Apparently, they contend that there is no logically better explanation for such ‘mysterious’ occurrences except the divine power of a God or Devil that “works in mysterious ways.”
With reserved contempt of such delusions, I concur with Joseph Conrad, a renowned author who once noted that: “The belief in a supernatural source of evil is not necessary. Men alone are quite capable of every wickedness.”
So, as the saying goes, “desperate situations require desperate measures,” for us to guard against such misconstrued and rampant beliefs and cultures that threaten the survival, morality and advancement of humanity, we ought to adopt an unorthodox but viable idealism essentially based on rationality, facts, science, empathy and tolerance, in order to counter and control their illogical weaknesses and potential adversity.
Well, given the realities of science in this modern 21st Century, maybe it is high time we considered embracing Charles Darwin’s realistic theory of evolution and natural selection. Who knows, the truth could be right in front of us after all. For what it’s worth, the theory rightly infers to the undeniable reality of gradual change that all animals and plants undergo in life.
In fact, if you thoughtfully look into its details of the survival and adaptability of all living things; evolution makes more real sense than creationism.
To me, yes; creationism is an interesting and awesome theory with touching and moving stories, but when you plumb it all the weaknesses abound and many things really don’t add up, especially with the numerous contradictions and (mis)interpretations of the good scriptures, just like with any masterpiece; it’s timelessly excellent and inspiring, but not logically ideal.
Unfortunately, it’s a pity that many people up to now cannot differentiate between reality and imagination, or fact and fiction.
Anyway, like DH Lawrence put it, in regard of Sigmund Freud’s Psycho Analytical Theory: “The writer sheds his ‘sickness’ on paper.”
In essence, all I am saying is that the onus is now on our generation to at least use our brains better, in a rationally critical way, to think and/or act with good will for posterity.
BY: HASSAN HIGENYI
A Pioneer Member of Freethought Kampala
Email: higenyihassan@yahoo.com
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 23, 2010 at 7:43 pm
Hassan
James, finally i got it now!
April 23, 2010 at 8:33 pm
James Onen
Wow! Finally! Your very first post on the FK blog. Hope to see more!
April 23, 2010 at 8:49 pm
James Onen
Hassan, you said:
You might want to verify that, Hassan:
Scientific American – Do People Only Use 10 Percent Of Their Brains?
Wikipedia – 10% of brain myth
The claim that ‘only 10% of the brain is being used’ has not really been validated by science.
But nice essay, none the less.
January 29, 2011 at 1:22 am
Hassan
…felt like revisiting this after receiving an email about it from a reader.
And yes James, you’re right about the 10% brain myth, but somehow at the time i wrote this piece it kinda just appealed to me in a catchy way and felt convincing in tandem with the fact that all humans are fallible and thus perhaps actually don’t max our brain potential.
Thing is, for clarification to other readers, i intended for this piece to be an interesting (or rather casual) opinion which is not necessarily factual but persuasive.
July 27, 2011 at 3:00 pm
mulu hanny
hassan its a great piece, i love it but am religious and i have heard all this before so i take it as jib jabber , and in the end, usually, you “intellect rational homo sapiens” get to the see the light or cowardice when the world tests you and turn back to religion..(where we welcome you with open arms)
plus there are facts that prove creation and totally totally rule out evolution though i personally think they both co-exist…
hypothetically intellectually looking at this God doesn’t exist thing, what if we lived a spiritual life and turns out there’s no heaven,..or also lived a non godly life on earth and turns out there’s God…i know you’ve heard this before…
simple maths, its a win win for me, your on chance….
i know your already classifying my whole thinking in the vegetates’ with wilfully ignorant and misinformed, desperately vulnerable, manipulative, indoctrinated, brainwashed or somewhat hypnotized and overwhelmed by fear and desire of the imaginary hell-fire and the fantasy of paradise in the hereafter,….which intellectually sounds true but I don’t care, I serve a God and i don’t have to prove it to you that His real.
July 27, 2011 at 8:12 pm
Hassan Higenyi
Hanny Mulu, i wonder where to start with you on this, or whether there’s any point in it anyway. First of all, you started off by contradicting yourself… how can a great piece (by your own rating) again be jib jabber?!
About your hypothesis of a win-win for you in the hereafter (if such a thing really exists), i recommend you look up (google or bing) “Pascal’s Wager”. And then i ought to correct you for saying “I know your already classifying my whole thinking in ….”. No, you don’t “know”, you THINK or PRESUME… and wrongly so i must say.
Also, my friend, am sure it’s not that you don’t have to prove to me that your God is real, NO; you simply CANNOT prove it even if you badly wanted to.
Thanks for reading, though, and please don’t stop at reading, think critically, too. I can tell you from personal experience, you won’t regret it; contrary to popular say, ignorance is no bliss for one with a neo-cortex. Cheers.